tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post7844521934365943322..comments2024-03-28T02:21:41.938-04:00Comments on The Patchery Menagerie: Question...Milliehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12610068948963465925noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-69806309445201854602014-07-10T09:38:38.395-04:002014-07-10T09:38:38.395-04:00It's not a distraction at all.
I suppose you ...It's not a distraction at all. <br />I suppose you are wedded to the neutral background? I think that saucy lady would stand out even more if the fabric she was pieced into had a little more contrast.<br /><br />Looking forward to seeing where this goes.MrsBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00598178529833967916noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-32122812118789268682014-07-09T19:49:34.759-04:002014-07-09T19:49:34.759-04:00To me, it's clear (pun intended) on it's o...To me, <b>it's</b> clear (pun intended) on it's own, but whether it would be in the finished quilt and whether to not she will become a distraction will depend on the context and what the rest of the fabrics/letters surrounding it.sophiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13408822963659450038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-35894583888677085102014-07-09T16:40:50.226-04:002014-07-09T16:40:50.226-04:00I saw the word because you said it was there. The ...I saw the word because you said it was there. The apostrophe helped. I like the lady, but she's distracting.<br />Nancy Near Philadelphiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08803134620826322075noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-71697614719761853122014-07-09T13:56:28.188-04:002014-07-09T13:56:28.188-04:00At a quick glance it appears to be an "O"...At a quick glance it appears to be an "O" but then looking closer, it apparent it is an "i" since "ot's" doesn't mean anything. You didn't ask but I love the red apostrophe ;-)Cherie in St Louishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01292832934556141810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-71623881274881112252014-07-09T12:57:45.449-04:002014-07-09T12:57:45.449-04:00I think she is a distraction. Maybe if the backgr...I think she is a distraction. Maybe if the background were a darker color but IT’S hard for me to see the word for meNancyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09674847522230123039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-67742908978805663602014-07-09T11:55:32.558-04:002014-07-09T11:55:32.558-04:00"It's" is readable.
Hugs"It's" is readable.<br />HugsTerrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08927552672720816359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-88241722834900857732014-07-09T11:41:21.441-04:002014-07-09T11:41:21.441-04:00I think if the word was part of a phrase I'd s...I think if the word was part of a phrase I'd see it. By itself, I needed you to tell me that it was a word for me to look for that first letter. What if you outlined the lady in a very very narrow border of red? Michellehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01308680396802432722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-60982400746839745292014-07-09T10:14:51.555-04:002014-07-09T10:14:51.555-04:00I saw the word because you told me it was there......I saw the word because you told me it was there.... If its part of a sentence I might see it right away. Rebeccahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06651396265516069702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-876786811100310032014-07-09T08:54:25.051-04:002014-07-09T08:54:25.051-04:00Distraction: yes, because I had to infer the "...Distraction: yes, because I had to infer the "I" after reading the other letters, and at first she read as an "O." Then I had to go back and inspect the lady. Not unreadable, though.lindaroohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13378726866013609136noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-75504155564541233802014-07-09T08:26:35.379-04:002014-07-09T08:26:35.379-04:00Knowing how you work, there is a very good reason ...Knowing how you work, there is a very good reason why the apostrophe is red ... We just don't have enough context yet to "get it" ...<br /><br />Ditto for the lady as the letter "I" -- in your previous quilts, the ladies have held up their challenges once their phrase/word fits into the grand scheme.<br /><br />SO- Not a distraction - perhaps more of a mini-puzzle or invitation to look more closely ...Quiltdivajuliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15593385265961892847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-52472430946676314212014-07-09T07:25:42.431-04:002014-07-09T07:25:42.431-04:00I see it's. Then I thought about the old time ...I see it's. Then I thought about the old time calligraphy. The first letter is embellished and all fancy. I'm not sure that is the way to go since I find they can be a distraction! joe tulipshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12184873686705028459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-74449948758075554042014-07-09T06:32:08.851-04:002014-07-09T06:32:08.851-04:00I also saw its as a word. she is a little distract...I also saw its as a word. she is a little distracting but I agree with most of the comments above. the apostrophe brown would be better, the context of the quilt would help to see the word its etc.sewyouquilt2https://www.blogger.com/profile/07422106403699477143noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-4089323547035981852014-07-09T04:31:44.782-04:002014-07-09T04:31:44.782-04:00I saw "it's" immediately, Lynne, but...I saw "it's" immediately, Lynne, but I wonder whether that's because I'm only looking at three letters, close up, without any distractions surrounding it and I was told to expect to see a word.<br /><br />If this word was in a quilt, then it may not be as clear. On the other hand, if the word "it's" is to be included in a sentence or phrase -eg. "It's a long way to Tipperary"! - then that would help viewers see what was intended. Context will make a difference.<br /><br />Megan<br />Sydney, AustraliaMeganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03143400920174171516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-2953882026515412352014-07-09T03:21:07.828-04:002014-07-09T03:21:07.828-04:00Love the little lady! It took me a second but I c...Love the little lady! It took me a second but I can see the "I".Eat Sleep Quilthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16128823480396332414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-56656998977275169592014-07-09T02:18:14.677-04:002014-07-09T02:18:14.677-04:00It's popped out immediately, but then I can re...It's popped out immediately, but then I can read those letter and number challenges almost every time.<br /><br />Looking forward to the rest of the message.Sandihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07601853322552968292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-19788061525222198942014-07-09T01:56:14.862-04:002014-07-09T01:56:14.862-04:00Yes it's readable but takes a moment to 'g...Yes it's readable but takes a moment to 'get' the apostraphe ! I think the red is distracting and a brown one would be better.suzan almondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339773099129273216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3766891572053927127.post-23902252956496046022014-07-09T01:49:25.041-04:002014-07-09T01:49:25.041-04:00"it's" always fun to answer your qu..."it's" always fun to answer your questions. She is a distraction, but if that is the correct word in quotation marks above, than not a whole lot of distraction since that was the first thing I saw when I looked at the post and I wondered what was in store for the next quilt.<br />stitchinpennyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06341867288910993051noreply@blogger.com